Governance lessons from a gurdwara inquiry: registering, records, and answering the regulator

In August 2026 the Charity Commission opened a statutory inquiry into two charities connected to a gurdwara in Wolverhampton, after they failed to comply with orders to provide information — following concerns raised by members of the congregation about an unregistered charity said to have been operating since 1980. As always, opening an inquiry is a fact-finding step, not a finding of wrongdoing. But whatever its outcome, the situation is a helpful prompt for faith communities of every tradition — because so many gurdwaras, mosques, temples, churches and synagogues began as informal arrangements and grew into something much larger without the paperwork ever catching up. This article draws out the general lessons. It is general information, not advice.

Why this matters beyond one community

This is not a story about Sikh charities, any more than the overseas-funding inquiries were stories about Muslim or Jewish ones. It is about a pattern common to all faith communities: an activity begins on trust among a few people, money and responsibility grow, and the governance never quite formalises. The lessons below apply wherever that has happened.

Lesson 1 — Register when you cross the threshold

In England and Wales, a charity must generally register with the Commission once its income exceeds the registration threshold (or if it is set up as a CIO). Running an organisation that is charitable in purpose, and over the threshold, without registering it is a compliance failure — even if it has quietly done good work for decades. If you are not sure whether your place of worship, or an associated fund or project, should be registered, that is worth checking now rather than when the Commission asks. (Our guide to choosing a legal structure is a starting point.)

Lesson 2 — Always answer the regulator

A recurring feature of cases that escalate to a statutory inquiry is not the original problem — it is failing to respond. When the Commission asks for information, or issues a formal order to produce it, that is not optional, and ignoring it is itself a serious matter that can trigger or deepen an inquiry. The right response to regulatory contact is always the same: engage promptly, openly and fully. Silence looks like something to hide, even when there is nothing.

Lesson 3 — Be accountable to your own community

Many inquiries begin with concerns from within — members or worshippers worried about how trustees are appointed, how money is handled, or who really controls the organisation. Where those concerns can’t be answered internally, they travel to the regulator. Good governance is, in large part, simply being transparent to the community you serve: clear about who the trustees are, how decisions are made, and where the money goes. This connects to taking compliance seriously and to finance as every trustee’s responsibility.

Formalise as you grow

If your community has operated informally for years, the fix is not dramatic — it is a proper governing document, a clear trustee board, accounts appropriate to your size, and registration where required. Doing it deliberately, before anyone asks, is far easier than doing it under scrutiny. At the most serious end, unresolved governance failures can lead the Commission to use its strongest powers, including appointing an interim manager — a situation every board would rather avoid.

---

This article is general information, not advice. Whether and how to register, and the right structure for your organisation, depend on your circumstances. Check the current position with the regulator, or talk to us and we’ll help you get the governance foundations in place.